Supreme Court's Tamil Nadu Governor verdict is judicial zeal gone too far
A critical appraisal of the Supreme Court's judgment on the Tamil Nadu Governor controversy — where the Court's reach may have exceeded its constitutional remit.
Rigorous analysis, original research, and grounded perspective across ten pillars of national renewal — from governance and justice to culture and ecology.
With over 50 million cases pending across India's judiciary, the question is no longer whether technology must play a role — but how to deploy it without eroding procedural fairness for the most vulnerable.
India's 63 million small businesses power the economy but remain structurally excluded from the formal credit ecosystem.
Before the colonial rupture, India's temples were centres of learning, art, astronomy, and civic life. What would it mean to restore that role?
Two decades after their introduction, citizen charters remain largely decorative. Evidence suggests a path to enforcement.
Courts, constitutional challenges, legal reform, and access to justice for every citizen.
Evidence-based analysis, submissions, and recommendations on national issues.
Digital governance, emerging tech, and innovation deployed for public good.
Curriculum reform, institutional quality, and Bharatiya knowledge systems.
Public health policy, healthcare access, and integration of traditional medicine.
Trade, industry, self-reliance, and economic justice for all citizens.
Accountability, anti-corruption, institutional reform, and ethical administration.
Heritage, identity, arts, and India's civilisational continuity.
Conservation, climate policy, and dharmic stewardship of natural resources.
National security, border affairs, internal stability, and strategic affairs.
A critical appraisal of the Supreme Court's judgment on the Tamil Nadu Governor controversy — where the Court's reach may have exceeded its constitutional remit.
The impeachment process is a solemn constitutional remedy — not a political instrument. A warning against weaponising it for institutional score-settling.
When courts loosen the requirements of locus standi, do they strengthen access to justice — or weaken the integrity of adjudication? A doctrinal examination.
The controversy over Bharat Mata's image at official functions reveals a deeper civilisational anxiety — and an opportunity to reclaim constitutional identity.
In the aftermath of Pahalgam, voices calling for internationalisation of the response miss the point. India's sovereign answer must be swift, certain and internal.
The Vice President's critique of the Supreme Court opens a larger conversation about the constitutional dharma that binds all three branches of government.
Reservations premised on religious identity strike at the secular foundations of the Constitution. A legal argument for why such schemes must not survive judicial scrutiny.
When a sitting judge speaks on the Uniform Civil Code, the reaction reveals more about India's legal culture than the speech itself. A defence of open constitutional discourse.
A detailed legal history of the Ram Janmabhoomi litigation — the evidence, the arguments, and what the Supreme Court's verdict ultimately settled and left open.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's most significant departure from its colonial predecessor is its centering of the victim. What this shift means in practice.
A comprehensive analysis of India's new criminal law trilogy — what changes, what continues, and whether the decolonisation project goes far enough.
From electronic records to witness protection — a section-by-section breakdown of what India's new evidence law adds, removes, and clarifies.
The acquittals in the Malegaon blast case are not merely a legal outcome — they are a reckoning with how prosecutorial overreach and political motivation distort justice.
Fifty years on, the Emergency remains the darkest chapter in India's constitutional history. Its lessons for today's democracy are more urgent than ever.
The political mobilisation against Bihar's electoral roll revision exposes a disturbing pattern of advocacy for those who have no legal right to be on the rolls.
The Supreme Court's ruling securing India from illegal Rohingyas reaffirms a foundational constitutional principle: territorial rights belong to citizens, not migrants.
Sambhal is not an isolated incident but a symptom of unresolved historical wounds. True healing requires acknowledgment, not erasure.
Forty years after Shah Bano, the Supreme Court's ruling on Muslim women's maintenance rights closes a circle of injustice that politics once forced open.
The defamation verdict against Medha Patkar exposes how civil society activism can slide into motivated and malicious personal attacks — and the courts' role in checking that.
The proliferation of institutions claiming minority status to escape regulatory accountability represents a systematic abuse of Article 30 — and demands judicial correction.
The Gyanvapi litigation is not merely a property dispute — it is a civilisational question about whether India's legal system can honestly confront its historical legacy.
The Supreme Court's unanimous upholding of the abrogation of Article 370 is a landmark that will define the constitutional jurisprudence of national integration for decades.
The Supreme Court's refusal to recognise same-sex marriage navigates a complex labyrinth of constitutional interpretation, legislative competence and social change.
A comprehensive cover story on India's new criminal law framework — the philosophy behind the bills, the debates they sparked, and what genuine reform requires.
The case for simultaneous elections goes beyond saving money — it is about restoring governance continuity and ending the permanent campaign mode that paralyses policy.
On Swami Vivekananda's birth anniversary, a reflection on what India's youth owe to the nation — and what the nation owes to its youth.
No articles match your search.
Try a different term or browse by pillar above.